Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

"Traditional Catholic" historians coverup truth

“In the case of Pico della Mirandola’s Judaic handler, Flavius Mithridates, protection and promotion was granted to Flavius by Pope Innocent VIII. With regard to Pico, he was exonerated of all imputations of heresy by Pope Alexander VI’s Brief of June 18, 1493. It is at this momentous historical juncture—which has proved invisible to the approved writers of the “classic Catholic histories,” and nearly three centuries before Rousseau and Kant—that a malevolent spirit was unleashed upon the Catholic world, emerging blatantly in the documents of the Second Vatican Council. No less than John-Paul II’s most revered cardinal-theologian bore witness to this astonishing fact in a book published in France, which was influential among the hierarchy, but otherwise languished in obscurity, neglected by those who insist there is no such phenomenon as a Renaissance occult papacy. The book was never translated into English by any enterprising researcher in all the annals of ‘conservative andtraditional' Catholic scholarship until we commissioned a translation of this key text for exposition in our new book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.” 

Sunday, May 14, 2017

The Truth at all cost

The Great Divide 
Michael Hoffman

Delusion that is so intense it constitutes hallucination is nothing new. When the movie moguls chose to foist upon the public the definitive character assassination of the dissident English historian David Irving with their “Denial” film, it flopped at the box office, despite an A-list cast and top notch production values. But what “Denial” revealed about the insecurities of the “Holocaust” lobby was priceless: despite the image they project of omniscient certainty that the matter of Auschwitz’s homicidal gas chambers is definitively settled, and all who doubt are “deniers,” the movie-makers themselves have their own doubts!

The “Denial” movie is a gem for revisionists because of its admission that so-called “Holocaust survivors” can’t be called to the witness stand in criminal or civil court where there is an astute cross-examiner present, like David Irving in his libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt, or defense attorney Doug Christie during the 1985 Zundel trial. What does this say about the quality of their “testimony” when it cannot withstand knowledgeable cross-examination? This stunning admission from the movie “Denial” severely undercuts the Holocaustianity which has been elevated to a hallowed position of unassailable Sacred Dogma, which only a lunatic, neo-Nazi or an “anti-Semite” would contradict.

The Six Million kabbalism is only part of a wider epistemology which embraces Charles Fort’s study of the effect of belief in anomalies on humans. Fortean epistemology is not concerned particularly with “solving” the mystery of UFOs or Bigfoot, for example, but in studying the effect of belief in those anomalies on humans who accept them as true.

Reading Charles Fort (especially the last two of his four books) and Eric Hoffer’s
 The True Believer, led me to start to scrutinize the phenomenon of partisan cheerleading for “our side.” About 20 years ago this writer began to examine Right wing myths that were supposedly incumbent on a revisionist to believe. This is an oxymoron of course, since revisionism is not a belief system or a political framework for Left wing or Right wing triumphalism. It is the enemy of dogma and it subjects everything to a new vision (re-vision) based on the discovery of heretofore unknown facts. Asking a revisionist, “Whose side are you on?” ought to be futile. The true revisionist is on the “side” of a forever-digging historiography.

Partisans may agree with that idea in principle, but when the revisionist practices what he preaches they may howl, withdraw support, attack, calumniate or stalk angrily off. This occurred when we took a look at the boatload of Right wing nonsense floated over the past eighty years concerning the English Stuart King Charles I and the Puritan Army Commander Oliver Cromwell. Charles was put forth as an enemy of usury, Judaism and the occult. The Puritans were portrayed as Jew-worshipping pawns who opened the borders of Britain to the hordes of Antichrist for filthy lucres’ sake. I discovered that none of that cartoon was true and that the beneficiaries of the hoax were the partisans of the Church of Rome. The story had been given legs by Archibald Ramsay in
 The Nameless War and by Hilaire Belloc, a talented prose stylist who is something of a lay saint to conservative Catholics.

Our research (in the newsletter
 Revisionist History®), turned up the fact that Charles I and his Romanist wife were up to their necks in usury, Judaism and proto-masonic networks; that it would be his son, King Charles II, who first initiated Judaic immigration into England in earnest and not the Puritans, whose Parliament had in fact rebuffed Cromwell. Belloc’s “histories” of the Stuart monarchs are a palimpsest of fraud (or rank incompetence — he wrote hurriedly for money at this point in his career). Belloc himself was a usurer (he loaned at interest to his own family) and his definition of usury was the same defective one that had been modified by the situation ethics of the popes of the 16th century forward. Were these revisionist revelations welcomed? By some, yes. By many, no. I had let “our side” down, wink, wink. Wasn’t I aware that revisionism was just a device for making certain Protestants and most “Jews” look bad? Exposing the errors of “Saint” Belloc was also unforgivable.

What happened to all the high-minded ideals that we cast in the face of our enemies? “Truth at any cost,” no matter whose toes are stepped on? “Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger,” etc. For some people these are slogans that are employed in the war of ideas, nothing more. They believe we must win at any cost, with Machiavellian tactics behind a revisionist mask.

We discovered this again when we found at some cost, that a substantial portion of “Holocaust revisionism” is a project of rehabilitating the reputation of Adolf Hitler in order to have his movement resurrected. Yes, that sounds like a B-movie Hollywood script and when aimed at all revisionists or perhaps even the majority it is probably grossly unfair. But in our experience it is true of at least a substantial minority, maybe nearly half of WWII revisionists.

When we began to research two areas of Hitler’s curriculum vitae that were not as well studied as other aspects of his life, the findings did not bode well for his cult following. We looked at Corporal Hitler in World War I and its aftermath. Of the fact that he was a courageous soldier possessed of reckless disregard for his own life is not something we contest. But of his claim (and it was hardly his alone) that Germany had lost the war because of a Judaic “stab in the back,” there was almost no evidence. They lost the war mainly because they were burdened with the policies of obstinate and obtuse German generals; scapegoating Judaics in this regard was part of the Cryptocracy’s plan to extrude the mass of patriotic, Talmud-despising German Judaics, who identified with German culture and saw themselves as Germans first. The rabbis wanted these German-Judaics destroyed and Hitler was their avenging angel in this regard. After that issue of our newsletter was published many subscriptions were canceled.

More cancellations would follow when we researched and published the first new biography of Gregor Strasser in years. He was the National Socialist anti-usury leader (and master organizer) who was very inconvenient to have on hand after Hitler came to power and proceeded to buttress the very usurious forces he had campaigned against. Gregor Strasser was framed for a non-existent plot against the fuhrer and murdered (Leon Degrelle seconded Hitler’s lies about Gregor). More subscriptions were canceled after those facts were published. Hallucination trumps history not just among “the Jews” and “the Republican neoncons,” but among some of our own people.

To disenchant people of cherished delusions is a lonely vocation. Human nature being what it is, history teaches that people demand enchantment, a word which has come to be associated with love and beauty, but which has no association with truth, without which there is no authentic love or beauty.

Not to worry about us, however. Some of what “history teaches” has been put in suspended animation by this strange era of ours in which the clock on the wall of destiny is at five-minutes-to-midnight, and ticking. As we lost readers who were possessed by the same epistemology as the rabbis (“My-way-or-the-highway”), we kept or even attracted authentic revisionists and information connoisseurs. Thanks to that diehard readership we’re still here.

Which brings us to my book
 The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome which has just been published. This volume is a study in the laboratory of human delusion where five or more mutually contradictory beliefs are held by the papists; where monk Martin Luther’s Augustinian Superior General is a leader of the Cryptocracy; where the Kabbalah and Talmud are advanced by pontiffs known to consensus history as Judaism’s toughest adversaries, and where the primordial malignity of Pharaonic Egypt becomes the secret religion of the robber Church of Rome, which usurped the genuine Catholic and Apostolic Church of Dante, Francis of Assisi and Anthony of Padua.

Revisionist history consists in the never-ending enterprise of digging for facts in a cosmos where the original sin of our own subjectivity is forever leading us astray. The resistance to that allure is the task of the revisionist historian.

At its most fundamental level, the division among people is not between Republicans and Democrats; Judaics and gentiles; Protestants, Muslims and Catholics; or blacks and whites or rich and poor. It is between those who seek the truth at all cost, no matter how damaging and disruptive to their own prized and revered beliefs, and those who prefer the comfort of a lie. That, ladies and gentleman, is the great divide.

Michael Hoffman is the author of a new book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. You can order it here.

Copyright©2017 Revisionisthistory.org

For Further Research:

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 74 “RIGHT WING MYTHS WITH AN ENDLESS SHELF LIFE." Was John Calvin a "Jew"? Were the English Puritans who overthrew King Charles I agents of the Judaic Money Power?  Did Oliver Crowell readmit the Judaics to England? Many non-Zionist Right-wingers believe the answer to all three of these questions is yes. It is our hope that uncovering these Big Lies will serve to illustrate a defective epistemology. 20 page magazine.  
USA price $10.00. 
Canada: $11.00. Foreign: $12.00

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 75 : "CORPORAL HITLER IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR." On the hundredth anniversary of the start of the fratricide, revisionist historian Michael Hoffman clears away the myths and disinformation surrounding Hitler’s military record from 1914 to 1918. What did the young Hitler actually do in the war? Did he deserve the Iron Cross?  How was he viewed by his fellow soldiers?  What were his authentic views of “the Great War”? At long last here is reliable, objective information that may surprise you, based on the latest cutting edge research and testimony. Also in this issue: “Resurrection Denial: A Cosmic Evil in Our Midst.” Government, the Churches and the media all obsess about and denounce “Holocaust denial” while the organized denial of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ merits little or no protest or outrage. USA price $9.00. Canada: $10.00. Foreign: $11.00  

REVISIONIST HISTORY® NEWSLETTER NO. 80: HITLER HAD HIM MURDERED: GREGOR STRASSER, THE GERMAN VISIONARY WHO COULD HAVE LED HIS NATION TO A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM. The Untold History of the Exemplary Life and foul Assassination of one of the Greatest German Leaders of the 20th century. USA price $10.00. Canada: $11.00. Foreign: $12.00

TO ORDER: U.S. Customers pay by check, money order or Discover card, VISA or Mastercard (please provide your account number and expiration date). Canada and Overseas pay by International Postal Money Order, a check in US dollars from a US bank, or Discover card, VISA or Mastercard (please provide your account number and expiration date). Be sure to specify what you are ordering and include your complete address. Send your payment to: Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA. Checks must clear our bank first before orders can be shipped. Idaho residents please add 6% sales tax. Thank you! 

E-mail: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org (substitute @ for "at" in the preceding address) 

Legal Notice
Revisionist History® is a registered trademark of
Independent History & Research Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene  Idaho  83816  USA

Saturday, April 29, 2017

The Disgusting Face of Liberal Churchianity

Anglican Archbishop seeks a ban on David Irving’s books in libraries

Here is one reason why the Anglican Church, like all liberal denominations in Britain and Europe, is a ghost-like shell of its former self: the craven servility of its erstwhile Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, in obsequious submission to the requirements of the Zionist inquisition. 

“His Lordship" would be the first to howl in outrage if the Babylonian Talmud, with its racist imprecations against Jesus, Mary and the goyim, were to be withdrawn from the same libraries where Williams demands a ban on the World War II history books of David Irving. 

Good news: Manchester University librarians have rebuffed this clown. Mr. Irving’s dissident histories will continue to be displayed. The report is here


Thursday, April 27, 2017

Ernst Zundel barred from residing in the USA

Ernst Zundel has been barred from residing in the U.S.

By Michael Hoffman

Publisher, author, pacifist and German patriot Ernst Zündel, who has served more than seven years' imprisonment in U.S., Canadian and German jails for thought crimes, has been denied residence in the U.S on the basis that he is a thought criminal. In true Orwellian fashion, his life-long struggle against the defamation and group-libel of the German people has been classified as a hate crime.



Tuesday, April 25, 2017

The Other Side of the Talmud Debate

The Other Side of the Talmud Debate

In his reply, Hoffman points out the use of misdirection and censored texts in the Oxford lecture and the numerous errors and omissions employed to demonize Talmud critics and whitewash the Babylonian Talmud. Hoffman documents Talmudic racism and permission for homicide by quoting Rabbis Shimon ben Yohai and Moses Maimonides, as well as from the Gemara itself, and rabbinic authorities having the status of Posek Ha-dor and Gadol Ha-dor.


Friday, April 14, 2017

Erasing the perpetrators of the Crucifixion from history

O my people, what have I done to you? How have I hurt you? Answer me. 

I led you out of Egypt. 
From slavery I set you free.
I brought you into a land of promise; You have prepared a cross for me. 
I led you as a shepherd;
I brought you safely through the sea; Fed you manna in the desert;
You have prepared a cross for me. 
I fought for you in battles,
I won you strength and victory;
Gave you a royal crown and sceptre; You have prepared a cross for me. 
I planted you, my vineyard,
And cared for you most tenderly;
Looked for abundant fruit and found none - Only the cross you made for me. 

With a beam of cloud I led thee,
And to Pilate you lead me,
My people, what have I done to thee?

I gave you a crown of kingship,
And you give me a crown of thorns,
You are my people — why do you torment me?

Listen to my pleading
And do not turn away from me.
You are my people: will you reject me? For you I suffer bitterly.

The preceding text is a modernized, condensed translation of William Herebert’s rendering (in the 14th century) of the original, “Improperia" (ChristReproaches), an early medieval Catholic litany from the 9th century. 

Erasing the perpetrators of the Crucifixion from history

By Michael Hoffman

“At a Palm Sunday Mass, Pope Francis emphasized that ‘too many act like Pontius Pilate, denying justice' and he urged the faithful to see the cross as ‘the royal seat of God.' He added, 'If the mystery of evil is unfathomable, then the reality of Love poured through him is infinite.”

In fact, Pontius Pilate tried to acquit Jesus (Matthew 27:19-24). The Talmud agrees, stating that Jesus “had close connections with non-Jewish authorities and those authorities were interested in his acquittal.” (BT Sanhedrin 43a). 

So how is it that the media, popes of Rome, Protestants, conservative pundits (Bill OReilly, Judge Andrew Napolitano and many others), lay most of the blame on Pilate, and render him and the Romans generally as the evil perpetrators of the Crucifixion, while the actual perpetrators (I Thessalonians 2:14-15) are erased from history? 

When will theyand Pope Francishave sufficient manhood to declare on Palm Sunday and Good Friday: 

Too many act like the Jewish Pharisees, denying justice to the Palestinians, and through their influence over the modern media, slandering Zionism’s political and religious rivals in the West. 

(Hoffman, one of the most controversial and banned writers of the 21st century, is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods and Judaism Discovered).

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Sanhedrin condemns Jesus to death

The Vatican and the media blame the Romans, but the documentary record states otherwise:

The Sanhedrin condemned Jesus Christ to death

Research by Michael Hoffman